You sure made a case for Trevion Williams to the Kings in the second round. He'd be a great backup for Sabonis as the offense wouldn't have to change.
You also made me more comfortable with my Pacers taking Sharpe at six when you said development happens later. I'd still prefer Murray but I think he's going higher. I like Daniels as a W, but Sharpe may have too much upside to pass on.
Also, don't confuse Vegas odds with outcome predictions. Bookies win when the book is balanced and there are as many winners as losers so the outcome doesn't affect profits. If the line has moved for the number 1 pick, it is a reflection only on how people have bet.
You sure made a case for Trevion Williams to the Kings in the second round. He'd be a great backup for Sabonis as the offense wouldn't have to change.
You also made me more comfortable with my Pacers taking Sharpe at six when you said development happens later. I'd still prefer Murray but I think he's going higher. I like Daniels as a W, but Sharpe may have too much upside to pass on.
Also, don't confuse Vegas odds with outcome predictions. Bookies win when the book is balanced and there are as many winners as losers so the outcome doesn't affect profits. If the line has moved for the number 1 pick, it is a reflection only on how people have bet.